Visual legal news and reports.


 

Featured Series:

Supreme Court Coverage

Explaining each case in an infographic.

 

Featured REPORT:

The Supreme Court disappoints on political gerrymandering.

June 18, 2018

One of the biggest issues before the Supreme Court this term was political gerrymandering. Court followers anxiously awaited decisions in Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, both of which could have told the nation when political influence in districting goes too far.

Since 2004 the Court has been unwilling to step in because the Justices were unable to articulate the standard. Court followers hoped that the Court's acceptance of two political gerrymandering cases this term indicated it was willing to take another stab.

But the Court didn't seize the opportunity. Each of the cases allowed the Justices to resolve its issues before the Court had to consider the big question.

Gill v. Whitford was a case out of Wisconsin. Democrats claimed Republican authorities drew the state's voting district lines to an unfair Republican advantage. 

Benisek v. Lamone came out of Maryland. Republicans claimed Maryland Democrats "dismantled" one of the Congressional districts through the redistricting process so the Democrats would control the vote.

View the reports to see how the Court avoided the main political gerrymandering question in each.

 

In the News:

Feature in the Lawyerist!

In this fun article by the Lawyerist (Dec. 29, 2017), our founder introduces you to her workspace and includes some personal notes.

Subscript's founder was featured on The Gen Why Lawyer Podcast!

Hear our founder Mariam Morshedi tell Subscript's story.

Check out our Gill v. Whitford graphic on NPR!

See Nina Totenberg of NPR's This Supreme Court Case Could Radically Reshape Politics (Oct. 3, 2017)!


Recent Posts: