Husted v. A. Phillip Randolph Institute (Argument January 10, 2018)
Plaintiffs in this case argue Ohio's process for removing people from its voting rolls ends up kicking voters off the list illegally.
Ohio, implementing a voter registration procedure (actually, a voter unregistration procedure), is required to remove people off the rolls if they have moved outside the voting jurisdiction. In order to determine who has moved, Ohio looks at voter inactivity.
This last part is the part the Plaintiffs take issue with. Federal law says a voter cannot be removed from the voter list "by reason of the person's failure to vote." Plaintiffs argue that Ohio - in starting the address change removal process with a list of inactive voters - is violating the law.
Ohio has a strong response because its process seems to align closely with a process that the federal law explicitly permits.
The decision in this case will require detailed analysis of the language of the law.
We made two infographics for you on this case. One is the simple version - seen here.
If you want to get deep into the legal argument, check out the complex version (perhaps after reading this simpler version). It walks you through the arguments alongside the text of the law.