Lamar, Archer & Cofrin v. Appling (Decision June 4, 2018)
The Supreme Court limited what types of oral statements are considered fraud for purposes of bankruptcy discharge.
The bankruptcy code doesn't reward fraud. So if you file for bankruptcy, you won't be able to get discharged any debt that you incurred fraudulently. Sounds obvious. But what's considered fraud?
The debtor in this case (Appling) had accrued some law firm debt. At some point before getting more services, he told the law firm (Lamar, Archer & Cofrin) he'd be able to repay. He said he expected a tax refund of around $100,000, so no problem. Turns out, his tax refund wasn't near that.
Right to rely
Did the law firm have a right to rely on Appling's oral statement? Because at that point, Lamar continued to give Appling legal services, so either the services were incurred through fraud or they weren't.
The bankruptcy code says that oral statements "respecting" the debtor's "financial condition" are not fraud. They are more unreliable than when you put something in writing.
The law firm wants Appling's statement to be considered fraud - thus, not qualify for the oral statement exception. The law firm says that to qualify for that exception, the statement must be very general. It must relate to the debtor's big picture financials. That's what "financial condition" means; it's big picture.
Appling, however, said no way. The oral statement I made was just talk. It was an oral statement "respecting" my financial condition. It just happened to be about a single asset (my tax refund). But that doesn't make it fraudulent.
The Supreme Court agreed with Appling. The broader interpretation wins. See the Court's ruling for the statutory analysis written by Sotomayor. The syllabus might get you what you need.
View recent reports:
Border Wall: Can the executive waive federal laws and spend federal money without Congress?
Is the government a “person” who can request a “covered business method” patent review?
The Fair Housing Act protects people within certain groups from discrimination in the housing market.
The Supreme Court reinforced the longstanding rule that even a non-public sale may invalidate a patent.
Courts, not arbitrators, interpret the FAA, and the FAA’s arbitration exception applies to Oliveira’s contract.
Can Home Depot get the case moved from state court to federal court?
The arbitration court must decide whether the contract mandates arbitration.
Is the law firm a debt collector or just a party seeking foreclosure?
Infographic - The U.S. Budgeting Process (and Five Common Misconceptions About It)
The Supreme Court sends the environmental case back to the lower courts to review the agency’s “Critical Habitat” designation.
The defendants’ prior convictions count as burglary under the federal law.
What are Protected Classes? See our infographic explaining the legal term.
Are retired Federal Marshalls entitled to the same tax benefits as West Virginia State Police Officers and Firefighters?
Can iPhone App Store purchasers sue Apple for commission fees charged to app developers?
Can Bartlett sue the arresting officers for retaliation even if the officers had probable cause to arrest him?