Lamar, Archer & Cofrin v. Appling (Decision June 4, 2018)
The Supreme Court limited what types of oral statements are considered fraud for purposes of bankruptcy discharge.
The bankruptcy code doesn't reward fraud. So if you file for bankruptcy, you won't be able to get discharged any debt that you incurred fraudulently. Sounds obvious. But what's considered fraud?
The debtor in this case (Appling) had accrued some law firm debt. At some point before getting more services, he told the law firm (Lamar, Archer & Cofrin) he'd be able to repay. He said he expected a tax refund of around $100,000, so no problem. Turns out, his tax refund wasn't near that.
Right to rely
Did the law firm have a right to rely on Appling's oral statement? Because at that point, Lamar continued to give Appling legal services, so either the services were incurred through fraud or they weren't.
The bankruptcy code says that oral statements "respecting" the debtor's "financial condition" are not fraud. They are more unreliable than when you put something in writing.
The law firm wants Appling's statement to be considered fraud - thus, not qualify for the oral statement exception. The law firm says that to qualify for that exception, the statement must be very general. It must relate to the debtor's big picture financials. That's what "financial condition" means; it's big picture.
Appling, however, said no way. The oral statement I made was just talk. It was an oral statement "respecting" my financial condition. It just happened to be about a single asset (my tax refund). But that doesn't make it fraudulent.
The Supreme Court agreed with Appling. The broader interpretation wins. See the Court's ruling for the statutory analysis written by Sotomayor. The syllabus might get you what you need.
View recent reports:
A member of the Crow Tribe of Montana maintains a treaty right to hunt elk in Wyoming’s Bighorn National Forest.
Drug manufacturers must make a strong showing to prove FDA preemption defeats plaintiffs’ failure to warn claims.
Did Hunt, a relator in a False Claims Act case, file the case on time?
Can iPhone App Store purchasers sue Apple for commission fees charged to app developers?
Did the federal government violate law when it added a citizenship question to the Census?
Can the federal government refuse to trademark “FUCT” or is the mark protected speech despite that it may be scandalous or vulgar?
Bucklew cannot avoid Missouri’s standard execution method because of his medical condition.
Washington cannot apply the state’s fuel tax law to the Yakama Tribe fuel importer because it violates an 1855 treaty.
Is the cy pres class action award valid?
Should the Supreme Court overrule longstanding precedent on agency deference?
What is political gerrymandering? Our infographic explains.
Is the law firm a debt collector or just a party seeking foreclosure?
Can the company be liable if it shipped parts that later received asbestos insulation?
Did Virginia draw the voting maps in compliance with federal law?