Lamar, Archer & Cofrin v. Appling (Decision June 4, 2018)
The Supreme Court limited what types of oral statements are considered fraud for purposes of bankruptcy discharge.
The bankruptcy code doesn't reward fraud. So if you file for bankruptcy, you won't be able to get discharged any debt that you incurred fraudulently. Sounds obvious. But what's considered fraud?
The debtor in this case (Appling) had accrued some law firm debt. At some point before getting more services, he told the law firm (Lamar, Archer & Cofrin) he'd be able to repay. He said he expected a tax refund of around $100,000, so no problem. Turns out, his tax refund wasn't near that.
Right to rely
Did the law firm have a right to rely on Appling's oral statement? Because at that point, Lamar continued to give Appling legal services, so either the services were incurred through fraud or they weren't.
The bankruptcy code says that oral statements "respecting" the debtor's "financial condition" are not fraud. They are more unreliable than when you put something in writing.
The law firm wants Appling's statement to be considered fraud - thus, not qualify for the oral statement exception. The law firm says that to qualify for that exception, the statement must be very general. It must relate to the debtor's big picture financials. That's what "financial condition" means; it's big picture.
Appling, however, said no way. The oral statement I made was just talk. It was an oral statement "respecting" my financial condition. It just happened to be about a single asset (my tax refund). But that doesn't make it fraudulent.
The Supreme Court agreed with Appling. The broader interpretation wins. See the Court's ruling for the statutory analysis written by Sotomayor. The syllabus might get you what you need.
View recent reports:
The defendants’ prior convictions count as burglary under the federal law.
What are Protected Classes? See our infographic explaining the legal term.
Are retired Federal Marshalls entitled to the same tax benefits as West Virginia State Police Officers and Firefighters?
Can iPhone App Store purchasers sue Apple for commission fees charged to app developers?
Can Bartlett sue the arresting officers for retaliation even if the officers had probable cause to arrest him?
State and local employees - regardless of size - must comply with the federal age discrimination law.
How do modern technology companies complicate the relationship between individual privacy and law enforcement?
Will railroad employees have to help pay taxes on the money they receive if they’re injured at work?
Is the cy pres class action award valid?
How are the gerrymandering lawsuits impacting the Nov. 2018 midterm elections?
Can the government ask people about citizenship on the Census?
When can a party appeal a judicial decision in the middle of a case?
Can the company be liable if it shipped parts that later received asbestos insulation?
Does the Louisiana law place a “substantial obstacle” on the right to an abortion?
Can Knick bring her claim in federal court before going through state litigation first?