South Dakota v. Wayfair (Decided June 21, 2018)
Supreme Court grants a field day for state tax policymakers.
States have been trying to get a piece of the $28 billion online retail industry for years. And today, the Supreme Court gave them a major win.
Before today, states were prohibited from collecting tax on many online sales. As long the seller did not have a "physical presence" in the state, the transaction couldn't be taxed. Even when the company delivered massive amounts of goods to consumers in the state.
The "physical presence rule" came out of a 1992 Supreme Court case, Quill v. North Dakota. Quill had interpreted the Constitutional limits of state taxation. At the time, physical presence was a sensible limit to the Justices. But 1992 was a different day than today.
In recognizing the changed nature of commerce since the Internet Revolution, the Supreme Court overruled Quill.
The court said "extensive virtual presence" is sufficient to satisfy the Constitutional requirements.
What happens now?
States likely will begin collecting taxes on many more online transactions - especially those large businesses with "extensive virtual presences." South Dakota's opponents in the case (Wayfair, Overstock and Newegg), for example, will be among them. Of course, that means the company passes the taxes on by charging it to customers.
However, some major online retailers are already paying sales taxes around the nation. Amazon, for example, fought states for years on this issue and finally threw in the towel. Walmart and Target also comply with sales tax requirements for their online orders because they each have a "physical presence" in every state (in case you didn't notice).
On the other side, however, is a major benefit to states. Being able to tap into increased tax revenue, states will gain a significant amount of money to spend on general budget items like public schools, administrative departments and social programs.
The Court's opinion is here.
View recent reports:
Should the Supreme Court overrule longstanding precedent on agency deference?
What is political gerrymandering? Our infographic explains.
Is the law firm a debt collector or just a party seeking foreclosure?
Did Hunt, a relator in a False Claims Act case, file the case on time?
Did Virginia draw the voting maps in compliance with federal law?
Will railroad employees have to help pay taxes on the money they receive if they’re injured at work?
Is the death row inmate “insane” meaning he cannot be executed?
Is the cross shaped war memorial on public property Constitutional?
The Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against “excessive fines” applies to state governments.
Are retired Federal Marshalls entitled to the same tax benefits as West Virginia State Police Officers and Firefighters?
Border Wall: Can the executive waive federal laws and spend federal money without Congress?
Is the government a “person” who can request a “covered business method” patent review?
The Fair Housing Act protects people within certain groups from discrimination in the housing market.
The Supreme Court reinforced the longstanding rule that even a non-public sale may invalidate a patent.
Courts, not arbitrators, interpret the FAA, and the FAA’s arbitration exception applies to Oliveira’s contract.