Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, Establishment Clause Analysis.
Explaining the Establishment Clause argument in the Travel Ban case.
President Trump issued an executive order stopping travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States. He revised it after he got sued several times (for discriminating against Muslims) and lost. The revised executive order did not resolve the substantive issues, according to some.
Individuals and entities (including some states) claiming they are harmed by the second executive order sued the government. Plaintiffs won in two cases. Two district courts ordered the government not to implement the executive orders. The government appealed in two separate appeals courts, where it lost again.
The government now brings the cases (consolidated for purposes of argument) to the Supreme Court, where they will be heard in October 2017.
Subscript reports on the court process:
Subscript reports on immigration:
More information about the Travel Ban case:
- 4th Circuit appeals court documents
- 9th Circuit appeals court documents
- Supreme Court order accepting the case
Subscript is going deeper into the arguments of the case. Coming up, we will have graphic explainers on "deference," executive power in immigration, and history of the justices' rulings on these issues. Stay tuned! Subscribe below!